25 Nov
Posted by: BryanPerson in: Ideas, Recommendations
Last month, as I was listening to a webinar about the recently-published 2009 Tribalization of Business Study, I tweeted this top-level finding: “Getting people to engage and participate” is one of the biggest obstacles to building successful online communities.
David Parmet quickly responded with this observation: “I hate when these ideas are framed so that it’s the customers who should engage and participate. What about the companies?” [emphasis mine]
This felt like a blog post in the making, so I asked David to expand on his tweet. He willingly obliged, and his guest post is below.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
By David Parmet
Engagement is a two-way street. Unfortunately, very few marketers (and the bloggers who write about marketing) ever think about it from the “consumer” point of view.
We imagine (hopefully) that there is the amorphous blob of people out there on the Wild Web just waiting for a chance to “engage with their favorite brands”–a phrase I heard at a recent marketing conference. We convince ourselves that our customers are out there–captive to our every word–and just by the fact that we “engage” with them via social media, we have credibility and are “speaking with a human voice.”
I frequently cite a quote from a Kevin Smith movie to explain this phenomenon. To paraphrase: “The Internet is a world-wide communications platform where people from all over the world gather to trade pornography and bitch about movies.”
Even if you add “curse the management of their favorite team,” “look for news about Jon and Kate,” and “look up how much they’ve lost in the stock market,” there’s very little space there for “engage with their favorite brands” or “hang out on our Facebook Page.”
To imagine there’s a “community” out there waiting on the Internet for your brand to come along and “engage” with it is not only wrong, it’s a recipe for marketing disaster. Most of the social media marketing disasters come about from incorrect assumptions and misplaced expectations about the ways that online communities grow and prosper–with the belief that by opening their Facebook Page or Twitter account, the world will beat a path to their door.
The truth, as it always is, is far more complex.
Out there on the Internet is a whole universe of consumers, users, customers, and people who may or may not care about your brand, might have a problem they want solved, or just might not care. This is just the case as it is in the larger, offline world.
The companies that will succeed in this new world will be the ones that understand that customer engagement happens in many ways and on many platforms. It might be on Twitter or Facebook, or it might happen on a telephone call to customer support. And in many cases, your customers just might want to be left alone to do with your product or service as they want.
Be a responsive partner, and don’t rely on gimmicks and the latest hot tools to come along to present yourself to your customers. And remember, they are the ones keeping you in the black, so listen to what they are saying or not saying.
David Parmet is a social media and communications consultant. He blogs at Marketing Begins at Home.
3 Responses
Richard Millington
26|Nov|2009 1I really like this post.
It’s so true.
There is such a big gap between enabling interaction between members and your brand, which is as easy as creating a platform, and then spending the time motivating members to interact between each other.
Enabling something to happen and working hard to make it happens is a big gulf. Too much attention is spent on the former, not enough on the latter.
Ellen Hoenig
26|Nov|2009 2Great reminder to the many marketers/agencies and brands/cos out there that are ‘incorrectly’ assuming that the adoption of social media tactics automatically means ‘engagement’. Why do so many think that customers are waiting for the next blog or engagement tactic from a brand?
And you’re so right, engagement happens in many places, even on the old fashioned customer service telephone call…So brands need not think ‘one tactic OR another’, but AND–In the end, it’s still about creating ‘real’ value from their perspective –not the brands…and that takes lots of listening and hard work…Thanks!
Cindy Stephenson
17|Dec|2009 3Great post – and a unique way to come up with the idea for a post.
I’m reading Twitterville right now, and Shel talks repeatedly about the value of Twitter in allowing companies to listen to people and find out how they perceive your brand.